What should have happened instead? Is my thinking clear?
Constant molar flow rates were assumed in the treatment of this question, how would your approach to this problem differ if this assumption were not valid? To help students learn them, teachers should pose questions which probe student thinking, questions which hold students accountable for their thinking, questions which, through consistent use by the teacher in the classroom, become internalized by students as questions they need to ask themselves.
Do I need to provide an illustration of what I mean?
The Basic Building Blocks for Thinking: Nevertheless, when you become comfortable with and practiced in explicitly analyzing and evaluating these basic structures of thought, they will serve as a powerful set of guides for the generation of useful questions. Is My Thinking Relevant to the Issue? Assuming that the given reaction is highly exothermic, what is the advantage of using a semi-batch reactor for this process?
This question asks to describe the assumptions needed to arrive at the CSTR equation.
Could you give me an example? When I catch myself engaging in such flawed thought, I then question those conclusions.
What was the value or importance of ……. While this question could be a CTQ from the clarification category, it is not a good critical thinking question because it is superficial and the information is about the product and is not relevant to solving for the conversion and reactor volumes as well as critiquing the answers.
They are generated by every act of thinking by its very nature. Is my thinking relevant to the issue? Unavoidably in deciding to pursue some options I will be making some assumptions about my qualifications, the nature of the jobs themselves, and about the future the likelihood of my being satisfied by working in this or that setting, for example.
Once these relationships become clear, other relationships also become clearer to you. What is my purpose, goal, or agenda? Does that follow from what you said?
What might have happened if. What was the point of …? Coming to understand the basic standards for thought is not a matter of memorizing definitions of a set of terms.
One way to achieve this goal is through Socratic questioning. This is, of how to ask critical thinking questions, only a very sketchy example. Coming to understand the elements of thought is not a matter of memorizing definitions of a set of terms. What is a thesis paragraph you identify the difference parts Am I justified in doing so? What approach would you use to How can I best interpret the information I have?
As you explicitly seek out information, you will find yourself checking that information more closely and judging it more effectively. Questions based on the standards for thought are, sample research proposal political science we have already suggested, largely intuitive when explicitly expressed: I believe what "feels good," what supports my other beliefs, what does not require me to change my thinking is any significant way, what does not require me to admit I have been wrong "It's true because I have always believed it" innate self-validation: How are you taking into account the problems in the question?
The student is required to understand the problem in its entirety rather than just memorizing the approach used for specific conditions. What are the consequences of make the reaction order in integer? Unless we know the basic chemical building blocks of chemical composition, we cannot identify, examine, and check those building blocks and hence do chemistry.
How would you show your understanding of. What are the tech problem solving interview questions and disadvantages of each available job? Why did that happen? Print Page Change Text Size: Application Solving problems by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way.
Where can this be improved? While there are a number of universal standards, the following are the most significant: The Elements Enumerated Let us now consider these elements. The basic intellectual standards essential to critical thinking are not typically taught in schools or in the home. Of course, once we recognize that the human mind by nature is deeply prone to self-deception and to using thinking in a highly self-serving waythen, we should not be surprised that the implicit standards that humans instinctively use to assess thinking are not only intellectually flawed but actually intellectually absurd.
In other words, though we all frequently fall prey to using "absurd" standards because they often function subconsciously and self-servingly ; we nevertheless are quite capable of recognizing appropriate intellectual standards when they are put to us explicitly and consciously. For example, the statement "Just Say No" which is often used to discourage children and teens from using drugs, is clear, accurate, precise, and relevant.
To think as a human is to think for a purpose our thinking never lacks some end, some motivation, some goal. Which do you think is better….? Is My Thinking Accurate? What jobs are available that I might qualify for and would be interested in? Using Explicit Intellectual Standards to Assess Thinking As a developing critical thinker, you must not only regularly take your thinking apart and come to terms with its interrelated elements the constituent parts that make it upyou must also come to question those elements using explicit intellectual standards.
When the combination of thoughts are mutually supporting and make sense in combination, the thinking is "logical.
How is this similar to …? For example, suppose someone rubs me the wrong way on one occasion.
In other words, the irony of the failure of humans to make a commitment to substantive intellectual standards is not puzzling, however vexing it may be. How does that bear on the issue? Do I need to be more specific? I should make sure that I am not uncritically assuming that a job change will make my life better in general or that problems that stem from other parts of my life will be lessened by a change of job.
How can I most effectively apply for the jobs that best suit me?
Logic Does this really make sense? Questions for Thinking About Thinking: Explain in your own words.
Can you compare this with …? Is my thinking focusing on what is most significant?
What examples can you find to. How am I envisioning a change? And Questions That can be Used to Apply Them Universal intellectual standards are standards which must be applied to thinking whenever one is interested in checking the quality of reasoning about a problem, issue, or situation.
When is this un acceptable?
How would you categorise. What equations should I use to solve the problem? What evidence is there that…? Another is based on insight into fundamental standards for the assessment of thinking.
In fact, we cannot tell anything about it because we don't yet know what it is saying.
Is My Thinking Logical? What else could have changed the whole story?
Is the rate law expected to hold at a lower temperature? Check out this article: A similar, but better question is, What thought process led you to choose the CSTR equation for the case of constant volumetric flow rates?
Do I need to be more exact?